Thanks, Ralf! Best regards, Goetz.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Schmelter, Ralf <[email protected]> > Sent: Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2019 10:11 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <[email protected]>; Hotspot dev runtime > <[email protected]>; Java Core Libs <core-libs- > [email protected]> > Subject: RE: RFR (L, final): 8218626: Add detailed message to > NullPointerException describing what is null. > > Hi Goetz, > > thanks for the additional test. Looks good. > > Best regards, > Ralf > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lindenmaier, Goetz <[email protected]> > Sent: Montag, 30. September 2019 18:31 > To: Schmelter, Ralf <[email protected]>; Hotspot dev runtime <hotspot- > [email protected]>; Java Core Libs <core-libs- > [email protected]> > Subject: RE: RFR (L, final): 8218626: Add detailed message to > NullPointerException describing what is null. > > Hi Ralf, > > > The test should not omit these two bytecodes because the current > > implementation is the same. This can change and it is not much additional > code > > to add the two cases. > I implemented test cases for the missing invokes: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr19/8218628-exMsg-NPE/20-incremental/ > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr19/8218628-exMsg-NPE/20/ > > Best regards, > Goetz. > >
