Re: RFR 8233272 : The Class.forName specification should be updated to match the long-standing implementation with respect to class linking

[Mandy Chung]

On 11/15/19 10:38 AM, Brent Christian wrote:
That sounds good.  Test updated here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bchristi/8233272/webrev-04/

Looks good.  Minor: an additional check to consider is to check if 
NCDFE's cause whose message contains  "MissingClass" just to be sure.   
No new webrev needed.

Mandy