All these tests specify this already so it doesn’t seem sufficient.

-Phil.

> On Dec 7, 2019, at 12:07 PM, Igor Ignatyev <igor.ignat...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> can we just add '@modules jdk.incubator.jpackage' to 
> test/jdk/tools/jpackage/junit/junit.java to solve that? or some of the tests 
> run by test/jdk/tools/jpackage/junit/junit.java don't need 
> jdk.incubator.jpackage module?
> 
> -- Igor
> 
>> On Dec 7, 2019, at 11:57 AM, Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, since only a (relatively) small number of tests needed to be updated
>> this is fine with me at least for now. So +1
>> 
>> -phil.
>> 
>>> On 12/7/19, 5:48 AM, Andy Herrick wrote:
>>> Phil - are you approving this change ? - I think you are the only 
>>> registered Reviewer.
>>> 
>>> /Andy
>>> 
>>>> On 12/6/2019 8:11 PM, Phil Race wrote:
>>>> Well we could deprecate and remove the solaris port :-)
>>>> But until that is done this is the only way I know of.
>>>> we could require all jpackage tests to include some helper code which 
>>>> decides if it is applicable but that will be more work upfront and many 
>>>> jpackage tests are already platform specific so @requires is not going 
>>>> away.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -Phil.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 6, 2019, at 2:33 PM, Alexander Matveev 
>>>>> <alexander.matv...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Looks good, but is there better way to exclude tests on Solaris? I do not 
>>>>> like idea adding @requires for all tests.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Alexander
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 12/6/2019 10:35 AM, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
>>>>>> Looks good.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Alexey
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 12/6/2019 1:33 PM, Andy Herrick wrote:
>>>>>>> Please review this jpackager test fix for bug [1] at [2].
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> the fix adds "@requires (os.family == "linux") | (os.family == "mac") | 
>>>>>>> (os.family == "windows")" to all jpackage tests that were not already 
>>>>>>> filtered with "@requires (os.family == "XXX")"
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8235453
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8235453/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> /Andy
>>>>>>> 
> 

Reply via email to