Good catch! Daniel also pointed that out. I overlooked it. It needs
to add back a private no-arg constructor.
Mandy
On 12/9/19 9:18 AM, Victor Williams Stafusa da Silva wrote:
If you remove the deprecated constructor, the compiler will add a
default one. Wouldn't it be a better idea to make the deprecated
constructor private and throwing an exception?
Em seg., 9 de dez. de 2019 às 14:13, Mandy Chung
<mandy.ch...@oracle.com <mailto:mandy.ch...@oracle.com>> escreveu:
Looks good.
Mandy
On 12/8/19 10:58 AM, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please review this small API changes for JDK 15:
>
> JDK-8230771: Remove terminally deprecated constructors in
java.base
> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8235548
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8230771.0/
>
> Patch below.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Joe
>
> ---
>
old/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/ConstantBootstraps.java
> 2019-12-08 10:56:14.223168685 -0800
> +++
>
new/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/ConstantBootstraps.java
> 2019-12-08 10:56:13.999168685 -0800
> @@ -40,12 +40,6 @@
> * @since 11
> */
> public final class ConstantBootstraps {
> - /**
> - * Do not call.
> - */
> - @Deprecated(forRemoval=true, since="14")
> - public ConstantBootstraps() {}
> -
> // implements the upcall from the JVM,
> MethodHandleNatives.linkDynamicConstant:
> /*non-public*/
> static Object makeConstant(MethodHandle bootstrapMethod,
> --- old/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Modifier.java
> 2019-12-08 10:56:14.775168685 -0800
> +++ new/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Modifier.java
> 2019-12-08 10:56:14.555168685 -0800
> @@ -44,13 +44,6 @@
> */
> public class Modifier {
> /**
> - * Do not call.
> - */
> - @Deprecated(forRemoval=true, since="14")
> - public Modifier() {}
> -
> -
> - /**
> * Return {@code true} if the integer argument includes the
> * {@code public} modifier, {@code false} otherwise.
> *
>
