Hi Raffaello,

> On Mar 17, 2020, at 12:38 PM, Raffaello Giulietti 
> <raffaello.giulie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> there's a new version of the documentation [1] for the attached patch to 
> solve the long standing issues described in [2]. The CSR referred to in the 
> subject is in [3].
> 
> Besides many improvements in the proofs, a couple of simplifications and a 
> better overall organization (this is my hope), I could find an ideal 
> treatment of a special case that in the previous inception had a ugly, yet 
> pragmatic solution in form of rather ad-hoc switch constructs. The new 
> approach is mathematically clean and makes the code some lines shorter.

Thanks for cleaning up the background paper. I’ll plan to review initially at 
least the through the part I read before.

> The new code reflects this improvement and also adds a couple of additional 
> tests.
> 
> Passes tier1 tests.

A tier 1-3 test run is in progress.

> @BrianBurkalter
> Brian, can you please upload the patch to webrev? As usual, there's an email 
> attachemnt for your benefit. Thanks.

Le voila: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/4511638/webrev.04/

Best regards,

Brian

Reply via email to