Hi Adam,

I do not have strong emotions, leave it up to you. But did you read Rogers
mail from 21.feb?

http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-February/064878.html

Cheers, Thomas


On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 3:32 PM Adam Farley8 <adam.far...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> As mentioned by Tom, a third opinion is sought on the aforementioned
> minor test change.
>
> @Tom - I'd prefer to use the full version of the error messages to keep
> things clear, though I would not object to using your abbreviated version
> if it means getting the change in.
>
> So long as it passes when it should pass, and fails only when it should
> fail, clarity is a "would be nice", but ultimately a secondary priority.
>
> Thanks for your feedback. :)
>
> Best Regards
>
> Adam Farley
> IBM Runtimes
>
>
> "Thomas Stüfe" <thomas.stu...@gmail.com> wrote on 03/03/2020 10:52:10:
>
> > From: "Thomas Stüfe" <thomas.stu...@gmail.com>
> > To: Adam Farley8 <adam.far...@uk.ibm.com>
> > Cc: core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>
> > Date: 03/03/2020 10:52
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 8239365: ProcessBuilder/Basic.java test
> > modifications for AIX execution
> >
> > This is why I always was against handing up the result of strerror
> > to the user :) The same problem we would have when running with
> > different locales. We should have a platform agnostic string table
> > in the java lib for that purpose...
> >
> > As for the test, looks good, but I personally would shorten the AIX
> > patterns a bit or maybe try to find a short form fitting all
> > platforms (e.g. "[Pp]ermission").
> >
> > But thats just idle bikeshedding, lets see what others think.
> >
> > Cheers Thomas
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 11:43 AM Adam Farley8 <adam.far...@uk.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Reviews and sponsor requested for a small test change.
> >
> > Short version: When an AIX machine has the file set "bos.msg.en_US.rte",
> > the error messages are not in a form that the test expects, causing
> > failure.
> >
> > The simplest option appears to be adding the second potential form of
> the
> > message into the regex (see webrev).
> >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~afarley/8239365.1/webrev/
> >
> > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239365
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Adam Farley
> > IBM Runtimes
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> > 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>

Reply via email to