Daniel, have you considered that comment from Paul Sandoz to that CSR? > IMHO removing the @see is not necessary in this respect, it's useful to point > to related reduction methods.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8245970?focusedCommentId=14341561&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-14341561 > On 29 May 2020, at 14:14, Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > You should also remove the @see #average() tag. > I see this was already proposed in the CSR. > > When you push make sure to push with 8242281 (which is the bug id) > and not with 8245970 - which is the CSR id. I have corrected > the subject to help archeological search of the mail archive. > > best regards, > > -- daniel > > > On 29/05/2020 10:04, Conor Cleary wrote: >> Hi, >> The method-level documentation of Intstream::reduce(int, IntBinaryOperator) >> mentions the average function as a case of reduction even though the >> function cannot be used with the reduce method. This might cause confusion, >> this fix therefore removes the mention of the average function from the >> @apiNote. >> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8245970 >> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jboes/ccleary/webrevs/8242281/webrev.00/ >> Regards, >> Conor >
