Thanks for the reviews.
The copyright dates are updated in the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-nocomment-8251203-2/
The @serial javadoc tag is used on any serialization related field or
method.
Are there some missing? I expect javac would warn if they were missing.
Thanks, Roger
On 8/21/20 12:06 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 21/08/2020 16:09, Roger Riggs wrote:
Please review the addition of comments to classes and fields to resolve
javadoc "no comment" warnings in the java.lang and java.io packages.
The comments are derived from the existing behavior and context.
Looks good to me Roger.
I don't quite recall when the @serial javadoc tag should be used.
That is - should it be used when documenting a non transient
private field in the absence of serialPersistentFields ?
best regards,
-- daniel
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-nocomment-8251203-1/
CSR:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252129
Issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251203
Thanks, Roger
