Re: RFR(S): 8252407: Build failure with gcc-8+ and asan

[Alan Bateman]

On 24/09/2020 09:59, Kim Barrett wrote:

If possible, my preference would be to avoid the pragma cruft and write the
code in such a way that gcc8/9 without asan doesn't warn, and gcc10 doesn't
warn with or without asan. I've kind of lost track in the discussion of all
the variants whether that's actually feasible.

I agree, the program cruft in NetworkInterface.c is unmaintainable and 
not the right place for it.

-Alan.