On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 22:15:20 GMT, Kim Barrett <kbarr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Thanks for adding this asserts. If there is any reason to use `getInactive` >> by other references in the future, we could remove these asserts at that >> time. > > I didn't notice this before it was integrated. > > The test for inactive isn't right; rather than `next == this` it > should be `next != null`. This becomes apparent once > FinalizerHistogram is fixed to call getInactive() rather than get(). > > I noticed this while working on JDK-8256517, where I ran into some > similar issues. I will address these problems as part of that change. @kimbarrett thanks for correcting this inactive FinalReference assert. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1231
