On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:35:39 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Mandy Chung has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional 
>> commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into isEnqueued
>>  - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into isEnqueued
>>  - add suppress warnings
>>  - 8052260: Reference.isEnqueued() spec does not match the long-standing 
>> behavior returning true iff it's in the ref queue
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ref/Reference.java line 430:
> 
>> 428:      * This method was never implemented to test if a reference object 
>> has
>> 429:      * been cleared and enqueued as it was previously specified since 
>> 1.2.
>> 430:      * This method could be misused due to the inherent race condition
> 
> A small suggestion is to restructure the first sentence of the deprecated 
> message to say "This method was originally specified to test .. but was never 
> implemented to do this test", otherwise looks okay.

Yes, it reads better and we can also drop "as it was previously specified since 
1.2".

     * This method was originally specified to test if a reference object has
     * been cleared and enqueued but was never implemented to do this test.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1684

Reply via email to