No problem :-)
I've been advocating for renaming the <build>/jdk intermediary into
something that would make it perfectly obvious to newcomers that _this
is not it_, but I keep getting shot down. Short name convenient!
/Claes
On 2021-01-18 20:53, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
Alan,
Apologies for wasting everyone's time (my own included, although I learned
a lot!)
I found images/jdk, and with that there is no regression.
Back to square one :-)
Thanks,
Eirik.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 8:35 PM Eirik Bjørsnøs <[email protected]> wrote:
Alan,
I have been using "make images" all along. This
produces build/macosx-x86_64-server-release/jdk/modules with unpacked
modules.
I'm a bit confused since "make help" seems to indicate that "make jdk"
should create unpacked modules, while "make images" should perhaps not? Or
did I misunderstand?
Eirik.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 8:31 PM Alan Bateman <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 18/01/2021 19:24, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
For good measure, I did a JFR recording which revealed that
ExplodedModuleReader was doing file stat in 263 of 277 native method
samples.
Which lie explains all this, since the 15 I used was not shipped with
exploded jmods..
How do I build OpenJDK with packaged modules?
Have you done "make images"? You should see images/jdk in your build
output.
-Alan
