On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:12:34 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Or even maybe `rulesArray = >> lastRules.toArray(ZoneOffsetTransitionRule[]::new);`? > > Good point - but that would be: > > ZoneOffsetTransitionRule[] rulesArray = > lastRules.toArray(ZoneOffsetTransitionRule[]::new).clone(); Interesting. This last one is more concise, but it's a bit harder to reason about. The lastRules implementation could return an array of a type other than ZOTR[]. If it's unrelated or a supertype, this would result in ClassCastException -- probably not a problem. If it were a subtype of ZOTR[], this would get stored in the object's field. Is this a problem? Turns out it can't happen, since ZOTR is final. While not wrong, I don't think this is the right idiom. It occurs to me that there should by another overload Arrays.copyOf(array, newType) that changes the type without changing the length. This would let us get rid of the local variable. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2191
