On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:35:27 GMT, Chris Hegarty <che...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> This issue adds a new event to improve diagnostic information of Java
> deserialization. The event captures the details of deserialization activity
> from ObjectInputStream. The event details are similar to that of the serial
> filter, but is agnostic of whether a filter is installed or not. The event
> also captures the filter status, if there is one.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java line 1366:
> 1364: DeserializationEvent event = new DeserializationEvent();
> 1365: if (event.shouldCommit()) {
> 1366: event.filterStatus = status == null ? "n/a" : status.name();
We use null for missing value, so no need to have "n/a"
src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java line 1372:
> 1370: event.depth = depth;
> 1371: event.bytesRead = bytesRead;
> 1372: event.exception = Objects.toString(ex, "n/a");
You may want to change the name of the field to "exceptionMessage" to make it
clear it's the message, not the class.
src/jdk.jfr/share/classes/jdk/jfr/events/DeserializationEvent.java line 45:
> 43:
> 44: @Label ("Class")
> 45: public String clazz;
We typically use "type" when referring to a class.
src/jdk.jfr/share/classes/jdk/jfr/events/DeserializationEvent.java line 45:
> 43:
> 44: @Label ("Class")
> 45: public String clazz;
Is it possible to make the field of type Class?
src/jdk.jfr/share/classes/jdk/jfr/events/DeserializationEvent.java line 51:
> 49:
> 50: @Label ("Reference count")
> 51: public long totalObjectRefs;
"Reference count" sounds a bit like resource counter? Is that the case? If not,
perhaps "Object References" is better. We tried to avoid abbreviations. How
about naming the field "totalObjectReferences" or just "objectReferences"?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2479
