On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 08:53:43 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> If you and others think that we can ignore this case, then your proposed > approach of using this lazy holder for initialization, IMO, is much cleaner > and natural to read and I will go ahead and update this PR to use it. For me, at least, the holder pattern is clearer. I'm happy with that approach. ( I don't have an objection to the alternative, just a mild preference for the holder ) ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2893
