On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 13:30:27 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> ### Description
>> This fix is part of a previous effort to both cleanup/modernise JNDI code, 
>> the details of which can be seen in 
>> [JDK-8048091](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048091). A number 
>> JNDI methods under `java.naming` use Anonymous Inner Classes in cases where 
>> only a single object unique to the requirements of the method is used. The 
>> issues these occurrences of AICs cause are highlighted below.
>> 
>> - AICs, in the cases concerned with this fix, are used where only one 
>> operation is required. While AICs can be useful for more complex 
>> implementations (using interfaces, multiple methods needed, local fields 
>> etc.), Lambdas are better suited here as they result in a more readable and 
>> concise solution.
>> 
>> ### Fixes
>> - Where applicable, occurrences of AICs were replaced with lambdas to 
>> address the issues above resulting primarily in more readable/concise code.
>
> src/java.naming/share/classes/com/sun/jndi/ldap/LdapPoolManager.java line 401:
> 
>> 399:         return AccessController.doPrivileged(
>> 400:                 (PrivilegedAction<String>) () -> 
>> System.getProperty(propName, defVal)
>> 401:         );
> 
> If you want to avoid the cast then you could create the PrivilegedAction 
> explicitly, e.g.
> 
> PrivilegedAction<String> pa = () -> System.getProperty(propName, defVal);
> return AccessController.doPrivileged(pa);

An alternative here would be to use 
sun.security.action.privilegedGetProperty(prop, default).
The package is already exported from java.base to java.desktop, etc.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3416

Reply via email to