On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 04:32:14 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Hi Vladimir, > > This looks good to me - I went through all the files. > > It was nice to see how nicely compartmentalized the AOT feature was - that > made checking the changes quite simple. The one exception was the > fingerprinting code, which for some reason was AOT-only but not marked that > way, so I'm not sure what the story is there. ?? > > I was also surprised to see some of the flags were not marked experimental, > so there will need to a CSR request to remove those without going through the > normal deprecation process. > > Thanks, > David Thank you, David. We thought that we could use fingerprint code for other cases that is why we did not put it under `#if INCLUDE_AOT`. I filed CSR for AOT product flags removal: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265000 ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3398
