On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:54:26 GMT, Florent Guillaume 
<github.com+592810+e...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> While JDK-8148937 improved StringJoiner class by replacing internal use of 
>> getChars that copies out characters from String elements into a char[] array 
>> with StringBuilder which is somehow more optimal, the improvement was 
>> marginal in speed (0% ... 10%) and mainly for smaller strings, while GC was 
>> reduced by about 50% in average per operation.
>> Initial attempt to tackle that issue was more involved, but was later 
>> discarded because it was apparently using too much internal String details 
>> in code that lives outside String and outside java.lang package.
>> But there is another way to package such "intimate" code - we can put it 
>> into String itself and just call it from StringJoiner.
>> This PR is an attempt at doing just that. It introduces new package-private 
>> method in `java.lang.String` which is then used from both pubic static 
>> `String.join` methods as well as from `java.util.StringJoiner` (via 
>> SharedSecrets). The improvements can be seen by running the following JMH 
>> benchmark:
>> 
>> https://gist.github.com/plevart/86ac7fc6d4541dbc08256cde544019ce
>> 
>> The comparative results are here:
>> 
>> https://jmh.morethan.io/?gist=7eb421cf7982456a2962269137f71c15
>> 
>> The jmh-result.json files are here:
>> 
>> https://gist.github.com/plevart/7eb421cf7982456a2962269137f71c15
>> 
>> Improvement in speed ranges from 8% (for small strings) to 200% (for long 
>> strings), while creation of garbage has been further reduced to an almost 
>> garbage-free operation.
>> 
>> So WDYT?
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/String.java line 3230:
> 
>> 3228: 
>> 3229:     /**
>> 3230:      * Designated join routine.
> 
> Did you mean "dedicated"?

No, I meant designated. It is the routine that all other public API entry 
points call at the end to do the job. Would some other word more accurately 
describe that? I definitely didn't mean "dedicated".

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3501

Reply via email to