Mandy, thanks for the confirmation we'll not have follow-up jdkXXinternals :) Let me know if you have a spare minute to fix it some time soon, otherwise I'll be happy to assist.
-Aleksei On 22/04/2021 20:00, Mandy Chung wrote: > Hi Aleksei, > > Looks like is a bug. "JDK removed internal API" is the intended > description as it indicates that a non-existent API is referenced. > > I created https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265773 to fix this. > > thanks > Mandy > > On 4/22/21 4:21 AM, Aleksei Voitylov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> JDK-8213909 [1] (since JDK 12, backported into 11.0.11), aside from >> bringing great additions to transitive module analysis, introduced a >> slight change in output of jdeps: >> >> jdk-11.0.11/bin/jdeps -s reactor-core-3.4.5.jar >> reactor-core-3.4.5.jar -> jdk8internals >> reactor-core-3.4.5.jar -> java.base >> reactor-core-3.4.5.jar -> java.logging >> reactor-core-3.4.5.jar -> not found >> >> jdk-11.0.10/bin/jdeps -s reactor-core-3.4.5.jar >> reactor-core-3.4.5.jar -> JDK removed internal API >> reactor-core-3.4.5.jar -> java.base >> reactor-core-3.4.5.jar -> java.logging >> reactor-core-3.4.5.jar -> not found >> >> Note the difference "jdk8internals" vs "JDK removed internal API", not >> discussed in the relevant CSR [2] or the review thread [3]. This change >> is likely to affect some automation systems built around jdeps. Since >> the change has already landed, I wanted to check if there is a reason >> behind this naming change, and if "jdk8internals" should be the naming >> convention the users are expected to standardize their automation on >> going forward? >> >> I would assume most now are used to parsing for "JDK removed internal >> API" to determine if the project uses any removed APIs (and should >> probably be using --print-module-deps to feed jlink input), but I also >> see merit in having a single convention for mainline and CPU releases. >> >> -Aleksei >> >> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213909 >> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213915 >> [3] >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-November/056660.html >> >> >> >
