On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 12:52:54 GMT, Jorn Vernee <jver...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI.  The differences are outlined in [1].  In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either registers or on the stack following the normal calling
>> convention.  To handle this, va_list is a struct containing separate
>> pointers for arguments located in integer registers, floating point
>> registers, and on the stack.  Apple's ABI simplifies this by passing all
>> variadic arguments on the stack and the va_list type becomes a simple
>> char* pointer.
>> 
>> This patch adds a new MacOsAArch64 CABI type and MacOsAArch64Linker to
>> represent the new ABI variant on macOS.  StackVaList is based on
>> WinVaList lightly modified to handle the different TypeClasses on
>> AArch64.  The original AArch64Linker is renamed to AapcsLinker and is
>> currently used for all non-Mac platforms.  I think we also need to add a
>> WinAArch64 CABI but I haven't yet been able to test on a Windows system
>> so will do that later.
>> 
>> The macOS ABI also uses a different method of spilling arguments to the
>> stack (the standard ABI pads each argument to a multiple of 8 byte stack
>> slots, but the Mac ABI packs arguments according to their natural
>> alignment).  None of the existing tests exercise this so I'll open a new
>> JBS issue and work on that separately.
>> 
>> Tested jdk_foreign on macOS AArch64, Linux AArch64, and Linux X86_64.
>> 
>> [1] 
>> https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/writing_arm64_code_for_apple_platforms
>
> Hi Nick. Sorry for the late reply, I've been out sick. I'll hopefully be 
> taking a thorough look at this soon (still catching up on things).
> 
> I'm pretty impressed that such a large amount of code can just be shared 
> between the two platforms :)

@JornVernee thanks for the review. I'll park this until the JEP is integrated 
and then fix it up afterwards.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3617

Reply via email to