On Tue, 4 May 2021 20:13:20 GMT, Brian Burkhalter <b...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> On `/proc/cpuinfo` for example, `fstat()` succeeds but `st_size` in `struct >> stat` is zero. The correct position is however returned by `lseek()`. >> Apparently this proposal needs to be reworked to expect size zero when the >> size is in fact non-zero. > > Updated to handle `length() == 0` case. Not sure however whether for this > case it might not be better just to fall back to `super.readXBytes()` instead. Can you rename the native length and position methods to length0 and position0 as we will need to wrap these methods later. Also it will keep them consistent with RAF. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3845
