On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:54:50 GMT, Jorn Vernee <jver...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This patch rewrites the prologue and epilogue of panama upcalls, in order to 
>> fix the test failure from the title.
>> 
>> Previously, we did a call to potentially attach the current thread to the 
>> VM, and then afterwards did the same suspend and stack reguard checks that 
>> we do on the back-edge of a native downcall. Then, on the back edge of the 
>> upcall we did another conditional call to detach the thread.
>> 
>> The suspend and reguard checks on the front-edge are incorrect, so I've 
>> changed the 2 calls to mimic what is done by JavaCallWrapper instead (with 
>> attach and detach included), and removed the old suspend and stack reguard 
>> checks.
>> 
>> FWIW, this removes the JavaFrameAnchor save/restore MacroAssembler code. 
>> This is now written in C++. Also, MacroAssembler code was added to 
>> save/restore the result of the upcall around the call on the back-edge, 
>> which was previously missing. Since the new code allocates a handle block as 
>> well, I've added handling for those oops to frame & OptimizedUpcallBlob.
>> 
>> Testing: local running of `jdk_foreign` on Windows and Linux (WSL). Tier 1-3
>
> Jorn Vernee has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Address David's review comments

David, I've addressed your review comments.

For now I went with changing the return type of `on_entry` to `JavaThread*`, 
assuming the potential pointer conversion is not an issue. 

I tried for a while to implement a static assert to check that `Thread*` is 
trivial convertible to `JavaThread*` as well, but couldn't find a way to do 
that at compile time, so left it for now. It looks like C++ 20 has a type trait 
to check this: 
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/is_pointer_interconvertible_base_of (I 
think this does what we want). I thought maybe we could just mimic the 
reference implementation, but looking at for instance the MSVC STL 
implementation, this type trait is implemented as a compiler intrinsic, so I 
think we'll have to wait until we are on C++ 20 before adding such a static 
assert.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/149

Reply via email to