On Aug 2, 2021, at 10:39 AM, Lin Zang 
<lz...@openjdk.java.net<mailto:lz...@openjdk.java.net>> wrote:

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:52:23 GMT, Alan Bateman 
<al...@openjdk.org<mailto:al...@openjdk.org>> wrote:

Thank you for reviving the discussion.

I have not gone through the latest update in detail but there are some changes 
that are needed. Before moving forward with the CSR, I would like to give time 
for additional feedback  on naming and design.

 I am not sure  the builder names withXXX are the preferred naming pattern.

I have not gone through the latest update in detail but there are some changes 
that are needed. Before moving forward with the CSR, I would like to give time 
for additional feedback on naming and design.

This proposal will need a few iterations to get to the right API. There are 
several issues with the proposed GZIPHeaderBuilder, also GZIPHeaderData is 
mutable (having byte[] as elements in a record is a hazard). I will try to make 
time in the coming weeks to help.

Dear @AlanBateman and @LanceAndersen,
   Sorry for late response, and really appreciated for your help on looking at 
this PR. I will update the pr based on Lance's comments first. Thanks!

Hi Lin,

I would hold off on updates to the PR until Alan has a chance to provide his 
input.  I have not yet had time to go through everything outside of the very 
quick pass I made earlier.

Best
Lance

Lin

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3072

[cid:E1C4E2F0-ECD0-4C9D-ADB4-B16CA7BCB7FC@home]



Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com<mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>



Reply via email to