On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 01:00:18 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> This is an initial PR for expanded lint warnings done under two bugs:
> 
> 8202056: Expand serial warning to check for bad overloads of serial-related 
> methods and ineffectual fields
> 8160675: Issue lint warning for non-serializable non-transient instance 
> fields in serializable type
> 
> to get feedback on the general approach and test strategy before further 
> polishing the implementation.
> 
> The implementation initially started as an annotation processor I wrote 
> several years ago. The refined version being incorporated into Attr has been 
> refactored, had its checks expanded, and been partially ported to idiomatic 
> javac coding style rather than using the javax.lang.model API from annotation 
> processing.
> 
> Subsequent versions of this PR are expected to move the implementation closer 
> to idiomatic javac, in particular to use javac flags rather than 
> javax.lang.model.Modifier's. Additional resources keys will be defined for 
> the serialization-related fields and methods not having the expected 
> modifiers, types, etc. The resource keys for the existing checks related to 
> serialVersionUID and reused.
> 
> Please also review the corresponding CSRs:
> 
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274335
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274336
> 
> Informative serialization-related warning messages must take into account 
> whether a class, interface, annotation, record, and enum is being analyzed. 
> Enum classes and record classes have special handling in serialization. This 
> implementation under review has been augmented with checks for interface 
> types recommended by Chris Hegarty in an attachment on 8202056.
> 
> The JDK build has the Xlint:serial check enabled. The build did not pass with 
> the augmented checks. For most modules, this PR contains the library changes 
> necessary for the build to pass. I will start separate PRs in those library 
> areas to get the needed SuppressWarning("serial") or other changes in place. 
> For one module, I temporarily disabled the Xlint:serial check.
> 
> In terms of performance, I have not done benchmarks of the JDK build with and 
> without these changes, but informally the build seems to take about as long 
> as before.

Build change looks ok.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by erikj (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5709

Reply via email to