> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. There are more modern > alternatives which perform better: > 1. Plain String concatenation should be preferred > 2. StringBuilder is a direct replacement to StringBuffer which generally have > better performance > > In [JDK-8264029](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8264029) I > migrated only usages which were automatically detected by IDEA. It turns out > there are more usages which can be migrated.
Andrey Turbanov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: 8274879: Replace uses of StringBuffer with StringBuilder within java.base classes revert changes in spec to avoid CSR ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5432/files - new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5432/files/14005d1d..c8d68c2a Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=5432&range=01 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=5432&range=00-01 Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5432.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5432/head:pull/5432 PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5432
