On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 19:36:02 GMT, Mandy Chung <mch...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Mandy Chung has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Minor cleanup. Improve javadoc in CallerSensitiveAdapter > > The static Const/Poly/Var is doing better than the instance Const/Poly/Var in > the old implementation, which might imply that Unsafe might be slightly > faster for static field access than instance field access (I have to dig > further.). > > For the new implementation using MH, the cost of static field access and > instance field access looks like similar. Not sure which results show instance beating static? In both my runs and @mlchung's numbers above static appears slightly faster than instance (note that lower is better here). This seems reasonable since static does not carry a receiver, and a similar relative skew is there in the baseline as well. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5027
