Can I please get a review for this change which fixes the issue reported in https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8275509?
The `ModuleDescriptor.hashCode()` method uses the hash code of its various components to compute the final hash code. While doing so it ends up calling hashCode() on (collection of) various `enum` types. Since the hashCode() of enum types is generated from a call to `java.lang.Object.hashCode()`, their value isn't guaranteed to stay the same across multiple JVM runs. The commit here proposes to use the ordinal of the enum as the hash code. As Alan notes in the mailing list discussion, any changes to the ordinal of the enum (either due to addition of new value, removal of a value or just reordering existing values, all of which I think will be rare in these specific enum types) isn't expected to produce the same hash code across those changed runtimes and that should be okay. The rest of the ModuleDescriptor.hashCode() has been reviewed too and apart from calls to the enum types hashCode(), rest of the calls in that implementation, either directly or indirectly end up as calls on `java.lang.String.hashCode()` and as such aren't expected to cause non-deterministic values. A new jtreg test has been added to reproduce this issue and verify the fix. ------------- Commit messages: - minor test comment fix - 8275509: ModuleDescriptor.hashCode isn't reproducible across builds Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6078/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=6078&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8275509 Stats: 178 lines in 2 files changed: 174 ins; 0 del; 4 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6078.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6078/head:pull/6078 PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6078
