Hi Micheal, welcome, and thank you for your contribution!
I opened a bug id for you to track this: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280498 . I can sponsor this patch for you. You need one reviewer, I think. I don't have the cycles right now to think this through. I cc core-libs dev since this is a networking issue and one of their tests. Cheers, Thomas On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 2:50 PM Michael Felt <aixto...@felt.demon.nl> wrote: > Hello all, > > This is a test that fails in some environments - enough so that has been > added to the ignore-list at AdoptOpenJDK (now Adoptium). And it will stay > there until it gets fixed upstream. > > I researched this and came up with differences that are behave differently > depending on the environment, e.g., my server, and partitions hosted at IBM > garage respond - at CLI - > > ``` > > aixtools@x064:[/data/prj/aixtools/tests]ping 0.0.0.0 > PING 0.0.0.0: (0.0.0.0): 56 data bytes > > --- 0.0.0.0 ping statistics --- > 5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > ``` > > While at OSUOSL environment: > ``` > > aixto...@nim.bak:[/home/aixtools]ping 0.0.0.0 > PING 0.0.0.0: (0.0.0.0): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 140.211.9.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0 ms > 64 bytes from 140.211.9.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0 ms > 64 bytes from 140.211.9.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0 ms > > --- 0.0.0.0 ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max = 0/0/0 ms > ``` > > The patch is to make this test work in both environments - without any > need to change the `java.net.InetAddress` or > `java.net.Inet6Address` definitions. > > Regards, > > Michael >
