On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:30:46 GMT, Mark Sheppard <mshep...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> yes a redeclaration of timeout with a type long across the component >> would be a consistent approach, also > > so just to clarify, we're not taking the approach to homogenise the timeout > declarations, throughout the component, to be of type long? > > which would see LdapClientFactory constructor take a long timeout and > timeout member varaiables be redefined as long Not in this issue. I plan to file a follow up bug to make a slight change to the test. I would like to get this issue fixed ASAP and would appreciate the time to take a good look at the transition to a long timeout. (i.e. I'll handle it in that follow up issue) ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6568
