On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:13:46 GMT, Yasser Bazzi <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:
>> Hi, could i get a review on this implementation proposed by Stuart Marks, i >> decided to use the >> https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/api/java.base/java/util/random/RandomGenerator.html >> interface to create the default method `asRandom()` that wraps around the >> newer algorithms to be used on classes that do not accept the new interface. >> >> Some things to note as proposed by the bug report, the protected method >> next(int bits) is not overrided and setSeed() method if left blank up to >> discussion on what to do with it. >> >> Small test done on >> https://gist.github.com/YShow/da678561419cda8e32fccf3a27a649d4 > > Yasser Bazzi has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional > commits since the last revision: > > - fix missing periods > - Use final on initialized variable Since everyone agrees that using Random.from() seems like a better idea, should i keep this PR open and redo the patch at Random class or do another PR? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7001
