> > > Agreed. Also, this class is unusual in that it is not instantiated; like > `Arrays` or `Collections` it is a (small) bundle of static factories (or > are they algorithms?). I think as such it should be called `Carriers`. >
I don't know if it is still the plan. But there was talk about adding a java.util.concurrent.Carrier type? As well as various Carrier implementations. https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/loom-dev/2020-March/001122.html What about java.lang.runtime.ObjectShapes instead? Would fit in with ObjectMethods. /Kasper
