On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 17:09:21 GMT, Roger Riggs <rri...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I'm not too picky about how it is documented, as long as it is clear how the > number 1610612733 is computed and why its the correct number. And I think > that's working backward from Integer.MAX_VALUE. As for its precision, its > almost irrelevant since the actual size must be a power of two; and precision > is only important near the boundary of a power of two. A simple and obvious > explanation is better than one that is overly precise (when it matters). @RogerRiggs Got it. I''ve changed it and added some docs about the calculation, please have a look again. thanks. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7928
