On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:23:16 GMT, XenoAmess <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On a side note for unifying the skip buffer implementation of reader vs > > input stream: For the input stream subclasses in the JDK that have their > > own skip with buffering logic (as described in > > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/5872#discussion_r848950065), they > > almost always have only local-variable skip buffers (not kept as fields for > > reuse), and their buffers' max sizes are smaller that provided by the > > InputStream class. > > > > Imo we should check the usage of `skip` in other projects; in JDK it's like > > skipping 2 bytes in certain image formats, and I would expect usages like > > reading class file attribute name and size then skip by the read size. > > > > > This change may be problematic for servers with a large number > > > connections and an input stream for each connection. It could add up to > > > 2k to the footprint of each connection when skip is used. > > > > If per-object allocation is a problem, would it be feasible to allocate a > > static soft reference to a max-sized skip buffer? It can be potentially > > shared with the `Reader` class, too. > > No as security reason. Any subclass can read this buffer using read function， > thus might cause secure data leak. see https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/5855 ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5872
