Is that really a needed fix? enabling ADS and less strict parsing might introduce vulnerability but on the other hand NUL: should be allowed for it is a drive style not a ADS.
I would also think the number of users who want use NUL: is smaller than the number of users who benefit from ADS being forbidden. Especially since \\.\NUL or NUL should already work. Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net ________________________________ Von: core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev-r...@openjdk.java.net> im Auftrag von Brian Burkhalter <b...@openjdk.java.net> Gesendet: Saturday, April 23, 2022 3:20:02 AM An: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net <core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net> Betreff: RFR: 8285445: cannot open file "NUL:" Change the default value of the `jdk.io.File.enableADS` property to `true`. ------------- Commit messages: - 8285445: cannot open file "NUL:" Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8373/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=8373&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285445 Stats: 57 lines in 2 files changed: 52 ins; 1 del; 4 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8373.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8373/head:pull/8373 PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8373
