On Fri, 13 May 2022 11:17:20 GMT, Jorn Vernee <jver...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/foreign/abi/ProgrammableInvoker.java
>> line 215:
>>
>>> 213: for (int i = 0; i < highLevelType.parameterCount(); i++) {
>>> 214: List<Binding> bindings =
>>> callingSequence.argumentBindings(i);
>>> 215: argInsertPos +=
>>> Math.toIntExact(bindings.stream().filter(Binding.VMStore.class::isInstance).count())
>>> + 1;
>>
>> My gut feeling in this case would be that it's a bit strange to use
>> `Math.toIntExact` to do a safe cast when you don't do `Math.addExact` to
>> ensure that the result of the addition will not overflow. I wonder if a
>> simple cast wouldn't be more appropriate - unless you really think that you
>> might have more than Integer.MAX_VALUE bindings (which I doubt :-) ). But
>> that's just my feeling...
>
> Yeah, that's true. I don't really expect this to ever overflow, that would
> create issues in other cases as well (since the limit on argument count is
> 255 for instance).
>
> Okay, I'll switch this to a regular cast. (It doesn't matter too much I think
> because I'm also planning to remove this code:
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8685)
Fixed.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8697
