On Fri, 27 May 2022 22:09:22 GMT, Brent Christian <bchri...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review this change to replace the finalizer in 
>> `AbstractLdapNamingEnumeration` with a Cleaner.
>> 
>> The pieces of state required for cleanup (`LdapCtx homeCtx`, `LdapResult 
>> res`, and `LdapClient enumClnt`) are moved to a static inner class . From 
>> there, the change is fairly mechanical.
>> 
>> Details of note: 
>> 1. Some operations need to change the state values (the update() method is 
>> probably the most interesting).
>> 2. Subclasses need to access `homeCtx`; I added a `homeCtx()` method to read 
>> `homeCtx` from the superclass's `state`.
>> 
>> The test case is based on a copy of 
>> `com/sun/jndi/ldap/blits/AddTests/AddNewEntry.java`. A more minimal test 
>> case might be possible, but this was done for expediency.
>> 
>> The test only confirms that the new Cleaner use does not keep the object 
>> reachable. It only tests `LdapSearchEnumeration` (not 
>> `LdapNamingEnumeration` or `LdapBindingEnumeration`, though all are 
>> subclasses of `AbstractLdapNamingEnumeration`). 
>> 
>> Thanks.
>
> Brent Christian has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 14 commits:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into remove-finalizers
>  - Threading-related fixes
>  - NOW it builds
>  - Fix the merge fix
>  - Fix merge
>  - Merge
>  - Rename inner class to EnumCtx ; use homeCtx() in 
> AbstractLdapNamingEnumeration for consistencty ; new instance vars can be 
> final
>  - fix whitespace
>  - Merge branch 'master' into remove-finalizers
>  - Test changes to test new cleaner code
>  - ... and 4 more: 
> https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/ed8e8ac2...4af66bff

src/java.naming/share/classes/com/sun/jndi/ldap/AbstractLdapNamingEnumeration.java
 line 176:

> 174:             LdapResult newRes = 
> homeCtx().getSearchReply(enumCtx.enumClnt, enumCtx.res);
> 175:             enumCtx.setRes(newRes);
> 176:             if (enumCtx.res == null) {

This looks odd, setting the value using synchronized, but reading it without.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8311

Reply via email to