On 5 August 2015 at 22:05, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 August 2015 at 08:26, Brett Cannon <[email protected]> wrote: >> Nick and Donald, do you think you can have such a test setup up and running >> by October 31 (Halloween, 88 days away)? > > I'm planning to use Kallithea as my guinea-pig project for user level > package management in Fedora, so this will be a good test case for > carrying patches that haven't been merged back upstream yet. > > Since this won't need any of the integration-with-other-services > aspects, October 31 should definitely be doable.
After merging a docs patch forward from 3.4 to 3.5 and hence to default, I do have a related request for you or David, though: would one of you have time to review the currently proposed options and decide what we're going to do about autogenerating Misc/NEWS? The status quo is already broken for Larry's "separate repo" approach to release candidate preparation, and moving to a fully online review workflow is going to make it broken in general. I suspect a moderately unilateral "we are going to switch to generating Misc/NEWS <this way>" from one of you is about the only way we're going to get over the activation barrier. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
