On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Brett Cannon <bcan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:18 PM R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 17:44:04 -0000, Brett Cannon <bcan...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > OK, assuming David's in agreement then I think this approach wins with
>> > the
>> > comma-separated field for commits that the hg hook for Roundup
>> > auto-appends
>> > to and of course the field to enter the NEWS entry.
>> >
>> > Now the next question is how easy/hard is it to implement this, how long
>> > will it take, and who is willing to do the work? With this in hand we
>> > can
>> > propose it to python-committers for 3.6 since the NEWS file should be
>> > easy
>> > enough to back-fill to this approach while its still small.
>>
>> Yes I agree this is the best approach, assuming we can get it
>> implemented.  The advantage of #4, though, is that Ezio already did the
>> work.
>>
>> I'm *willing* to do the roundup work, but I don't know as I have the
>> required time, at least for the next month.  Part of the trick is the
>> need to get a test instance set up...there was work done at PyCon and
>> after at making a tracker-in-a-box, so I'd need to find out where that
>> was at and learn how to use it (or finish it, if needed).  The code
>> itself is probably a half-day job, probably including enhancing the hook
>> to update the commits field.  But together with getting a working test
>> instance we're talking a couple days work at least.
>
>
> Perk of getting the tracker-in-a-box working is it's a one-time cost that
> will be beneficial long term.
>

FYI Shiyao (one of the GSoC students) has been working on
https://bitbucket.org/introom/docker-b.p.o/src .

Best Regards,
Ezio Melotti


> I also don't think there is a rush since we still have to convince
> python-committers that this is the right solution. I plan to propose it on
> Monday to the list to make sure we have buy-in.
>
>>
>> Writing the NEWS generating script is a not exactly trivial job, but
>> probably wants to wait until we have the REST API.  So we'd have
>> upgrading our Roundup to that when it lands on the list as well, with a
>> 3.6 Beta 1 deadline on getting it all done.
>
>
> Yeah, so we have a bit of time to worry about the generation script.
>
_______________________________________________
core-workflow mailing list
core-workflow@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow
This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: 
https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct

Reply via email to