On Dec 11, 2015, at 03:27 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: >Any news from the gitlab CEO about what they will offer and what the plan >is? I'm still aiming to get everything squared away by Dec 15 so I have 2 >weeks to think things through.
Brett, see my question from 01-Dec - I think we should still try to outline what we want before we approach GitLab with our detailed request. I want to avoid the inevitable "What will you offer us?" "Well, what do you want?" back and forth. Also, as PEP 481 is still in contention as the alternative, it still mentions Phabricator which I believe is off the table, so that PEP needs an update. And afaik, none of the workflow PEPs actually describe Nick's HOCAEIT suggestion for getting the best out of both GitLab and GitHub. I know you want to make a decision soon, but IMHO we need to get these issues resolved before we can move forward. Cheers, -Barry
pgpizqgZLZmFr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
