This line of argument about what GitHub *might *do if they run out of money is not persuading me in the slightest, so I consider this line of argument closed.
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 at 11:07 Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: > Reminder that Github existed many years before they took outside > investments and they were successful and profitable long before they did. > They took investment to expand an already profitable company into > enterprise, not to cover expenses while they figured out how to make money. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Dec 12, 2015, at 1:17 PM, Stefan Krah <skrah.temporar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Only in the abstract. GitHub has an reported investment of 350.000.000, > > while GitLab only has a very small fraction of that. If selling private > > repos doesn't justify that kind of money, it's pretty clear what will > > happen! > _______________________________________________ > core-workflow mailing list > core-workflow@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow > This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: > https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct >
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
