Hi! On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:25:06AM +0000, Brett Cannon <[email protected]> wrote: > PEP is still not done, but I have at least fleshed out the parts required > to migrate the code-only and web-related repositories: > https://github.com/brettcannon/github-transition-pep/blob/master/pep-NNNN.rst > .
> Continuous integration per pull request > XXX https://travis-ci.org/ https://codeship.com/ https://circleci.com/ No buildbot? > Tools and commands to move from Mercurial to Git > A decision needs to be made on exactly what tooling and what commands > involving those tools will be used to convert a Mercurial repository to > Git. Currently a suggestion has been made to use > https://github.com/frej/fast-export. My personal experience with fast-export was a bit negative when I tried to convert a repository for a complex project with a number of branches and a lot of tags. I switched to git-remote-hg [1] and found it much better for my needs. See Comparison [2]. 1. https://github.com/felipec/git-remote-hg 2. https://github.com/felipec/git/wiki/Comparison-of-git-remote-hg-alternatives Oleg. -- Oleg Broytman http://phdru.name/ [email protected] Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN. _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
