On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:08:52 -0700, Senthil Kumaran <sent...@uthcode.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:57 PM, R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> > wrote: > > The general consensus (a while back) was that the fact that reitveld > > doesn't update the bug tracker issue is a bug, and we're trying to fix > > that :) > > Haha. Interesting. > > Github sends one email for every comment, it does not have a "draft" + > "publish" comments mechanism that Rietveld has. > This has the potential to create a lot of churn for some patches/reviews.
The obvious alternative is to just post a link to the PR with some summary about what was posted (perhaps who and how many comments?). I don't have an opinion at this point which would be better, but the core of the proposed patch would be the same, just the output would be different. --David _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
