> On Feb 22, 2017, at 2:42 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm +1 for turning on required status checks though - giving us a > strong incentive to get the test suite stable and keep it that way is > an unequivocally good thing, and I do want to keep the "PR required, > even for core developers" experiment going for at least another few > weeks.
I’m happy to switch this around, but I don’t know whose call it is. Does Brett need to make this call? I dunno. — Donald Stufft
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
