On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 at 10:08 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1 April 2017 at 09:23, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > I have created a bot that I hope we can use to host all non-CLA checks > for a > > PR that isn't covered by CI: https://github.com/brettcannon/bedevere. To > > start, the bot would check for a bugs.python.org issue number and set a > > failing status if one isn't found, else link the status to the issue > itself. > > > > If the approach I took in the bot seems reasonable to people I will add > > support for a "trivial" label which would cause the bot to say the check > is > > successful due to the fact that the PR is trivial enough to not warrant > an > > issue to begin with. We can then continue to expand this bot to do other > > things like check that there is a NEWS file (unless marked as "trivial"). > > +1 from me. >
And as a break from some political dealings I went ahead and implemented the "trivial" label support. So the bot is now coded to follow a pattern that I assume we will continue to use if we use this bot and add more status checks. > > > I don't want to role the CLA bot into bedevere since I created the bot in > > such a way as to be useful to other organizations on GitHub. So the > Knights > > Who Say Ni will stay a separate repo. > > Regardless of the practical details, I kind of like the idea of having > the Knights as a grumpy bot looking for a shrubbery(/CLA), and Sir > Bedevere as a happier, helpful bot that only complains when it gets > confused by a lack of information :) > :) Yeah, I was very happy when I got the inspiration for the name since it seemed to fit rather well.
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
