On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 at 21:24 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 17 April 2017 at 04:49, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > Appending to the body of the pull request is an interesting idea. I'm not > > sure what permissions the bot would need to have to be able to do that, > > though (write access with public_repo?). > > If you can figure out how to make it work, I think that plus a status > check would be the best option. > I poked around on a repo where I have write access but not admin access and it looks like at least through the web UI I can edit the PR body. So I *think* there's a good chance it's possible to append to the PR body something like: <!-- bedevere/issue-number --> [bpo-NNN](https://bugs.python.org/issueNNNN) is the associated issue with this pull request (and where all non-code discussions should occur, including discussing overall design approaches to solving the issue). <!-- END bedevere/issue-number --> Then the bot can look for the comments in the raw Markdown to know where the link is already present. > > Failing that, I think a comment would be a bit spammy, unless Bedevere > was smart enough not to comment on backport PRs. > It's possible if people add the appropriate cherry-pick label to the PR.
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
