On 9 May 2017 at 07:42, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > Enough people who work on CPython still use email that instead of just using > labels to flag PRs as cherry-picks we also edit the title, e.g. a 3.6 > cherry-pick will have both a "cherry-pick for 3.6" label and "[3.6]" > prepended to the title. > > My question is whether anyone is actually using the labels? I realize they > are somewhat redundant when we are also adding the title part. The labels > are also a friction point with cherry-picker.py as the script can't set > those automatically like it can the PR title. So I'm thinking that maybe we > should drop the labels? Anyone have an opinion or want to say if they use > the labels and how they use them?
I haven't seen a particular use for them - the "needs backport" ones are useful as a marker for what still needs backporting, but nothing changes in the process based on whether or not a maintenance branch PR is a cherry-pick or not. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
