On 14 February 2018 at 16:11, Brett Cannon <[email protected]> wrote: > I would consider a "code health" a more general type for things that are not > user-facing.
I agree "refactoring" would be too narrow, but "code health" has some of the same problems (since not all changes along these lines are going to be about code as such - e.g. syncing up changes to the docs build system). "maintainability", perhaps? Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/core-workflow.python.org/ This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/core-workflow.python.org/ This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
