Stefan Reinauer wrote: > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >>> I would appreciate any comments from the list on: >>> 1. hosting these VSA sources. Would coreboot.org be a good place to >>> keep the GNU-ified VSA sources? >>> >> >> Probably yes. The laptop.org GIT tree only has 2 revisions. Such an >> amount of change could easily be handled with subversion and >> coreboot.org surely could handle that. The final decision is made by >> Stefan, though. >> > Yes, we can add a seperate repository for that. Or even check it into > the coreboot tree? Would that make sense? > Whatever is preferred by you guys. > I think a separate repository would be better.
>>> 2. the idea of permanently moving to a GNU-buildable version? >>> >> >> It would certainly make outside contributions easier. >> >> > Yes, no need for MASM to build the whole thing is a great step > forward. Congratulations! > If you would like to understand the architecture the VSA developers guide is helpful. http://www.amd.com/files/connectivitysolutions/geode/geode_gx/32664B_gx_vsa2_proggd.pdf Marc -- Marc Jones Senior Firmware Engineer (970) 226-9684 Office mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.amd.com/embeddedprocessors -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
