On 06.02.2008 18:10, Peter Stuge wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 03:40:15PM +0000, Chris Lingard wrote: > >> Switch down >> bash-3.2# ./flashrom -m gigabyte:m57sli -V >> > .. > >> probe_spi: id1 0x7f9d, id2 0x7e >> Probing for PMC unknown SPI chip, 0 KB >> WARNING: size: 0 -> 4096 (page size) >> RDID returned 7f 9d 7e. >> probe_spi: id1 0x7f9d, id2 0x7e >> PMC unknown SPI chip found at physical address 0x100000000. >> Flash part is PMC unknown SPI chip (0 KB). >> > >> Switch up >> bash-3.2# ./flashrom -m gigabyte:m57sli -V >> > .. > >> probe_spi: id1 0x7f9d, id2 0x7d >> Probing for PMC unknown SPI chip, 0 KB >> WARNING: size: 0 -> 4096 (page size) >> RDID returned 7f 9d 7d. >> probe_spi: id1 0x7f9d, id2 0x7d >> PMC unknown SPI chip found at physical address 0x100000000. >> Flash part is PMC unknown SPI chip (0 KB). >> > > > This is rather strange. You're using an MX chip but it identifies > itself as PMC. Is the RDID byteorder messed up? >
I'm pretty sure the byteorder is OK. Even if the byteorder was messed up, a Macronix chip should have 0xC2 in there somewhere. Three possible explanations: - the switch does not work as intended - the chip has been relabeled - we are reading garbage from the SuperIO. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
