On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing I see as a problem in both versions is how I can specify
> different settings for each instance of a chip appearing multiple times
> on a board. (I may be misinterpreting struct name generation...)
I checked and the path is part of the instance. So if you have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. }
[EMAIL PROTECTED] { etc. }
and they're the same part, you still get two structs, one which looks like:
struct superio_winbond_hf86whatever_config ioport_2e
and
struct superio_winbond_hf86whatever_config ioport_4e
i.e you get the struct (the kind) and the path is flattened into the
name to make it unique (the instance).
ron
--
coreboot mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
